Current marketing strategies require the use of social media. The benefits of social media are the wide range of reach, low hard dollar costs, trending technology usage, and the viral capabilities that certain social media campaigns can yield. In addition, there are several social media monitoring services that can aid in determining success. A few of these services that were used when analyzing Nike vs. Adidas in social media success were:
• Google Insights: offers top regional search activity, as well as top keywords.
• Social Mention: this rates the “visibility” of brands on a wide variety of social media networks (Facebook, Twitter, Photobucket, Flickr, etc.).
• How Sociable: in depth analysis regarding user sentiment, as well as traditional social media sources and keyword searches.
When comparing the Google Insights results of Adidas and Nike, it is clear that Adidas is far behind. For example, the search terms for Adidas involved Nike- a huge competitor in the market place. To make matters worse, Nike was the number one search term for Adidas. Obviously, any time that a competitor’s search terms are jumbled with another brand, poor positioning should be remedied. Another odd finding through Google is the regional search interest. Adidas’ top search market came from Slovakia. Through research, minimal results were found to help explain this connection between Slovakia and Adidas. The only connection that can be made is Slovakia’s success in the World Cup, paired with Adidas being the jersey worn by the Slovakia team. The United States was not in the top ten of regional searches for Adidas, however, it ranked number two in Nike’s regional interest. This can be best explained by Nike’s brand involvement in Football and Basketball- two of America’s largest sports. Aversely, Adidas is mostly involved in Soccer, which is not popular in the United States.
Social Mention monitors twenty social media networks; ranging from the typical networks such as Facebook and Twitter, and extends to DIGG and Stumbleupon. This measures brand visibility across all networks. These results are broken down by visibility scores across all social media networks, as well as an all-inclusive single benchmark. When comparing Nike and Adidas, Nike beat Adidas in every single social media network. This is absolutely astonishing that a brand can lose to it’s competitor in all of twenty social media networks. For example, Google+ had a zero score for Adidas, while it had 240 for Nike. For Adidas, a major overhaul needs to be done social media wise (and keyword search as well).
How Sociable offered a unique metric in comparison to the other two sites. This site offers a “sentiment” score. Sentiment is a ratio that judges how many positive comments, statuses, or other content, is created in comparison to how much negative content there is. Obviously, you want a top heavy score. In this example, Adidas finally finished better than Nike with a sentiment score of 6:1 vs. 5:1 respectively. However, the keyword search results returned by How Sociable magnified Adidas’ downfall in search metrics. Adidas had more than just Nike as a competitor in their search results, Vans and “Chucks” were also shown as a top ten keyword search term.
Adidas really needs to analyze their search terms and social media visibility.



