The brands that we compared were Bud Light and Miller Lite. When looking at both brands through social media our group paid close attention to the level of buzz that was produced through social media, sentiment and how positive and negative the posts were, associated words that were produced with the brand, and message reach through the brands.
We focused on three social media tools which were Social Mention, Twendz, and Google Insights. When looking at Social Mention both brand had similar results however for Bud Light mentions were more frequent with a higher passion and reach. There were more positive and neutral posts about Bud Light. However, with this the negative comments were minimal but substantial. When people posted negative comments about Bud Light it was clear that it was negative and could not be mistaken for neutral. When looking at Miller Lite, its sentiment was not as strong as Bud Light’s it was 1:1 and had more negative posts with less frequent posts being posted about them. Their strength and reach of posts was also less than Bud Light. However, when looking at Miller Lite’s post there positive/neutral posts were very positive and neutral. They had a lot of customer engagement, with things such as a Miller Lite Christmas tree. When looking at their negative posts they were not really negative just had “bad” words in them. Twendz gave similar results at Social Mention it. When looking at Twendz the frequency of negative positive was far more for Bud Light then Miller Lite. The last Social Media tool that we used was Google Insights. This allowed us to see where people were searching for the products and what words they were searching for. For Bud Light which is brewed in St. Louis that is where it had the most regional interest, which was not surprising. For Miller Lite, where it is brewed in Milwaukee was where it had the most regional interest. What was interesting for Miller Lite was that St. Louis also ranked on their top 10 for regional interest. This is a down fall for Bud Light. The search words that were used for Bud Light and Miller Lite were not surprising. Bud Light has bud light cruise which was a popular event that they had during the summer, and Miller Lite had vortex which they advertise heavily. I thought it was interesting that Miller Lite also had jobs; people must really like their product and company if they are searching for jobs. As well as miller girls, their promotional team is doing a better job that Bud Light.
Then deciding on which brand fared better it was not a difficult chose. Miller Lite won by far. For Social Mention, they also had the same amount of posts and their negatives were not negative at all rather positives, and they are able to reach a large amount of people as shown in Google Insights. Not only are Miller customers interested in the product it goes farther than that they take the brand to heart and make Christmas trees with the product, recognize their commercials, and are even interested in becoming an employee in their company.
For Bud Light to become more competitive they should embody more social media prescience. They should comment on negative posts and prove that it is wrong. They should also have contest and sweepstakes, which was popular for Miller Lite.
This project was good because it allowed our group that ability to look at different aspect of social media and just not twitter or facebook. We were able to trace exactly what was being said, when it was being said, and by who. This is vital because you can reward key customers and help change views on people who do not see you brand in a positive light. These tools could also help marketing in the future. If these beers were being searched in different countries Miller Lite, and Bud Light could come with campaigns to expand into these markets. Social media gives good insights on who is your customer, who do consumers feel about your brand, and if expanding and advertisements in different locations are a good idea, as well as if commercials/promotions are working.

