Throughout the semester, and specifically in the last assignment, I have learned all different kinds of social media, internet, and analytic techniques that marketers can utilize. When it comes to the final project, my group analyzed Nike and Adidas. The findings were very interesting, and gave us a lot of valuable information on the companies, as well as great takeaways on web analytics.
As far as regional interest for both brands, there were some interesting findings. Using Google Insights, we looked at the countries with the most searches for both Nike and Adidas. Interestingly enough, Slovakia was the most popular location for searches for both countries. For Adidas, Germany was up there, as well as Czech Republic, Netherlands, and the UK were some of the top locations for brand searches. For Nike, after Slovakia, the US, Uruguay, Paraguay, the UK, and Trinidad and Tobago were the top searches.
Using Google insights, we also took a look at the top search items for both brands. For Adidas, Nike was the top search. This is very interesting, and presents a problem to Adidas. Adidas shoes, Adidas 2011, Adidas online, as well as Puma were some of the top search items. For Nike, Nike shoes, shoes, Nike air, eventually Adidas and Nike 2011 are all the top search terms. When analyzing this, we see that search items are association words, in other words, words that include product names or new models. This is important because it shows people are searching specifically for Nike and Adidas products, not just the brands itself. Searchers, or consumers, know what they want from the brands, and they are searching for them.
When analyzing visibility scores on how sociable, Nike’s score was higher, especially on Facebook, Twitter, and Stumble Upon. This shows that there are more mentions and brand awareness on social media sites for Nike than Adidas. As far as sentiment and reach, Nike has higher strength and passion, but Adidas has higher reach and sentiment.
The top keywords for each brand are very interesting as well. For Adidas, the words wear, sneakers, kill, funnyortruth, nikes, jordans, follow, chucks, as well as vans are popular keywords. This is not good for Adidas. People are associating other brands, other products, and bland words. On the other hand, Nike has keywords including shoes, mens, basketball, free, shox, cheap, and dunk. These are all positive because most of them are associated with the brand itself, and none of them are hurtful to the brand.
The sources for these mentions and searches for Adidas include photobucket, twitter, dig, stumbleupon, and youtube. Searches for Nike occur on dig, twitter, photobucket, stumbleupon, youtube, and facebook. The mediums are about the same, except for Facebook making it higher on the list than Adidas.
Nike plus is a great idea, and a great way to involve customers in their own social media network built around their brand. This is the future for social media, and after analyzing both brands, Nike is doing a far better job than Adidas.








